38 research outputs found

    ThicknessTool: automated ImageJ retinal layer thickness and profile in digital images

    Get PDF
    To develop an automated retina layer thickness measurement tool for the ImageJ platform, to quantitate nuclear layers following the retina contour. We developed the ThicknessTool (TT), an automated thickness measurement plugin for the ImageJ platform. To calibrate TT, we created a calibration dataset of mock binary skeletonized mask images with increasing thickness masks and different rotations. Following, we created a training dataset and performed an agreement analysis of thickness measurements between TT and two masked manual observers. Finally, we tested the performance of TT measurements in a validation dataset of retinal detachment images. In the calibration dataset, there were no differences in layer thickness between measured and known thickness masks, with an overall coefficient of variation of 0.00%. Training dataset measurements of immunofluorescence retina nuclear layers disclosed no significant differences between TT and any observer's average outer nuclear layer (ONL) (p = 0.998), inner nuclear layer (INL) (p = 0.807), and ONL/INL ratio (p = 0.944) measurements. Agreement analysis showed that bias between TT vs. observers' mean was lower than between any observers' mean against each other in the ONL (0.77 ± 0.34 µm vs 3.25 ± 0.33 µm) and INL (1.59 ± 0.28 µm vs 2.82 ± 0.36 µm). Validation dataset showed that TT can detect significant and true ONL thinning (p = 0.006), more sensitive than manual measurement capabilities (p = 0.069). ThicknessTool can measure retina nuclear layers thickness in a fast, accurate, and precise manner with multi-platform capabilities. In addition, the TT can be customized to user preferences and is freely available to download

    The Role of Mislocalized Phototransduction in Photoreceptor Cell Death of Retinitis Pigmentosa

    Get PDF
    Most of inherited retinal diseases such as retinitis pigmentosa (RP) cause photoreceptor cell death resulting in blindness. RP is a large family of diseases in which the photoreceptor cell death can be caused by a number of pathways. Among them, light exposure has been reported to induce photoreceptor cell death. However, the detailed mechanism by which photoreceptor cell death is caused by light exposure is unclear. In this study, we have shown that even a mild light exposure can induce ectopic phototransduction and result in the acceleration of rod photoreceptor cell death in some vertebrate models. In ovl, a zebrafish model of outer segment deficiency, photoreceptor cell death is associated with light exposure. The ovl larvae show ectopic accumulation of rhodopsin and knockdown of ectopic rhodopsin and transducin rescue rod photoreceptor cell death. However, knockdown of phosphodiesterase, the enzyme that mediates the next step of phototransduction, does not. So, ectopic phototransduction activated by light exposure, which leads to rod photoreceptor cell death, is through the action of transducin. Furthermore, we have demonstrated that forced activation of adenylyl cyclase in the inner segment leads to rod photoreceptor cell death. For further confirmation, we have also generated a transgenic fish which possesses a human rhodopsin mutation, Q344X. This fish and rd10 model mice show photoreceptor cell death caused by adenylyl cyclase. In short, our study indicates that in some RP, adenylyl cyclase is involved in photoreceptor cell death pathway; its inhibition is potentially a logical approach for a novel RP therapy

    Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition)

    Get PDF
    In 2008 we published the first set of guidelines for standardizing research in autophagy. Since then, research on this topic has continued to accelerate, and many new scientists have entered the field. Our knowledge base and relevant new technologies have also been expanding. Accordingly, it is important to update these guidelines for monitoring autophagy in different organisms. Various reviews have described the range of assays that have been used for this purpose. Nevertheless, there continues to be confusion regarding acceptable methods to measure autophagy, especially in multicellular eukaryotes. For example, a key point that needs to be emphasized is that there is a difference between measurements that monitor the numbers or volume of autophagic elements (e.g., autophagosomes or autolysosomes) at any stage of the autophagic process versus those that measure fl ux through the autophagy pathway (i.e., the complete process including the amount and rate of cargo sequestered and degraded). In particular, a block in macroautophagy that results in autophagosome accumulation must be differentiated from stimuli that increase autophagic activity, defi ned as increased autophagy induction coupled with increased delivery to, and degradation within, lysosomes (inmost higher eukaryotes and some protists such as Dictyostelium ) or the vacuole (in plants and fungi). In other words, it is especially important that investigators new to the fi eld understand that the appearance of more autophagosomes does not necessarily equate with more autophagy. In fact, in many cases, autophagosomes accumulate because of a block in trafficking to lysosomes without a concomitant change in autophagosome biogenesis, whereas an increase in autolysosomes may reflect a reduction in degradative activity. It is worth emphasizing here that lysosomal digestion is a stage of autophagy and evaluating its competence is a crucial part of the evaluation of autophagic flux, or complete autophagy. Here, we present a set of guidelines for the selection and interpretation of methods for use by investigators who aim to examine macroautophagy and related processes, as well as for reviewers who need to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of papers that are focused on these processes. These guidelines are not meant to be a formulaic set of rules, because the appropriate assays depend in part on the question being asked and the system being used. In addition, we emphasize that no individual assay is guaranteed to be the most appropriate one in every situation, and we strongly recommend the use of multiple assays to monitor autophagy. Along these lines, because of the potential for pleiotropic effects due to blocking autophagy through genetic manipulation it is imperative to delete or knock down more than one autophagy-related gene. In addition, some individual Atg proteins, or groups of proteins, are involved in other cellular pathways so not all Atg proteins can be used as a specific marker for an autophagic process. In these guidelines, we consider these various methods of assessing autophagy and what information can, or cannot, be obtained from them. Finally, by discussing the merits and limits of particular autophagy assays, we hope to encourage technical innovation in the field

    Multi-port PBG components in SOI photonic crystal slabs

    No full text

    Rod photoreceptor cell death in rhodopsin Q344X transgenic fish.

    No full text
    <p>(A) RT-PCR analysis of expression of ectopic rhodopsin Q344X transgene. (B) Sequence analysis of transgene in Q344X animal at 5 dpf. (C–H) Sections of normal rhodopsin fish at 3 dpf (C), 5 dpf (E), 7 dpf (G) and rhodopsin Q344X transgenic fish at 3 dpf (D), 5 dpf (F), 7 dpf (H). Rod photoreceptors are visualized with EGFP (green) and F-actin with phalloidin (red). (Bar = 100 µm.) (I) Graph of the number of rod photoreceptor of normal rhodopsin and rhodopsin Q344X mutant at 3, 5 and 7 dpf. (Bars mean SD, * means p<0.05, ** means p<0.01.) Rod photoreceptors decreased by 5 dpf. (J and K) Immunohistochemistry sections of retina of wild-type (J) and Q344X (K) animal. F-actin is visualized with phalloidin (red), rod opsin with antibodies (green) and nuclei with Hoechst33342 (blue). OS: outer segment, IS: inner segment, ONL: outer nuclear layer (Bar = 10 µm.) Cell localization of rhodopsin is abnormal in Q344X. (L and M) TUNEL (green) assay of sections of normal rhodopsin (L) and rhodopsin Q344X transgenic (M) animals. F-actin is visualized with phalloidin (red), and nuclei with DAPI (blue). Arrows indicate TUNEL positive photoreceptor cells. TUNEL staining in ONL was observed only in Q344X. (N) Graph of the number of TUNEL assay positive cells, comparing normal rhodopsin (black dots) and rhodopsin Q344X (red dots) transgenic animals. (Bars mean SD, * means p<0.05.)</p

    SQ22536 treatment of <i>rd10</i> mice.

    No full text
    <p>(A and B) HE (Hematoxilin-Eosin) stained sections from eyes of <i>rd10</i> mice at P28. Control PBS treated eye (A) and SQ22536 treated eye (B). OS: outer segment, IS: inner segment, ONL: outer nuclear layer (Bar = 10 µm.). (C) Graph of the thickness of INL (outlined bar) and ONL (solid bar) in <i>rd10</i> mice at P28. Control group (black) and SQ treated group (red) are compared. (Bars mean SD, * means p<0.05.) (D) Graph of the ONL/INL ratio of SQ22536 treated control (black bar) and untreated retina (red bar) in <i>rd10</i> mice. (E) Schematic illustration of adenylyl cyclase and apoptosis in rod photoreceptors. OS: outer segment, CC: connecting cilium, IS: inner segment, R: rhodopsin, T: transducin, AC: adenylyl cyclase.</p
    corecore